Marketing To Teens: Avoiding Health Or Warning Letters


Marketing To Teens: Avoiding Health Or Warning Letters

A secretive e cigarette company which has captured millions of dollars in profits annually by exploiting a loophole has said it is temporarily suspending sales in the U.S. till further notice. However, regardless of the news, the company’s website still lists several other countries where the product is available. The company, based in Canada, markets Puff Bar as an electronic cigarette that can be used as being a regular cigarette. The only real difference is that when you light Puff Bar, it mimics the looks and feel of a genuine cigarette. Actually, some consumers have compared the puffing action of the merchandise compared to that of a cigarette, and smokers around the world have embraced the new product with both of your hands.

Puff Bar

The Puff Bar was launched in Canada in January, with plans to enter other countries shortly. Regardless of the recent launch, the web site still lists several countries where the product is not available. Among the countries list may be the U.S., where in fact the product is specifically targeted at younger consumers. The U.S. isn’t the only country where the Puff Bar cannot currently be purchased. In line with the website, there are no plans to release the product in the U.S., although it remains the goal of the company to make the product obtainable in the U.S.

A company representative in Canada told Canadian television station CPolitics that there is “no immediate plan” to sell the Puff Bar in the U.S. She denied reports in the media that the business was considering bringing the merchandise to the American market, and instead referred all inquiries to the European company’s home country. The representative didn’t mention the loophole that allowed the product to be sold in Europe, or the possibility that the loophole have been discovered before the product was launched in Canada. The U.S. patent office has ordered the trademark to be granted to the two names used to generate the e cigarette, which are Smaxx and Vapro. Because the Puff Bar is still illegal in the U.S., it can be difficult for manufacturers to EightVape ship their products into the country.

There are several arguments against allowing flavored e cigarettes in the U.S. Many public health experts fear that flavored the Cigs include a level of nicotine that’s too much to be healthy. In addition they fear that children may be enticed to smoke with flavors that appeal to their more sensitive psychological needs. One reason that the U.S. patent office has allowed the Puff Bar to be sold in Canada is because of its safety. The product is regulated by Canadian law and must meet standard quality controls.

The Puff Bar also is apparently safer than its pre-filled counterparts. It does not contain any nicotine and only includes a small amount of propylene glycol, an ingredient that is commonly used to promote cleanliness and stop greasy foods from spreading. The propylene glycol in the Puff Bar also serves to help make the product attractive to younger consumers, since it tastes good.

Like all vaporizers, the Puff Bar also allows users to get rid of nicotine without using real tobacco. The ingredients in puffs make sure that there is no contact between your smoker’s mouth and the product, thus eliminating the opportunity for nicotine to be absorbed through the skin. Unlike a traditional cigarette, an individual does not have to hold the Puff Bar in place. With the puff bar, the complete surface of the device is covered with heat-sensitive material, which ensures that the Puff Bar does not emit smoke.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration remain examining the Puff Bar to find out whether or not it constitutes a hazard to public health. This loophole in international patent law allows manufactures to advertise their products based on names that not represent any health dangers, such as for example “The Puff”. The loophole in U.S. patent law allows manufacturers to capitalize on potential names that sound much like well-known brands without creating a public health risk. For instance, one company has trademarked the term “Candy” and developed several variations of its product, including candy bar and mixed bag candy bar. The lack of health or trademark significance will not appear to have hindered the company from selling the products to the public.

The lack of health or warning letters on all of the major tobacco products may help contribute to the current wave of youth smoking that began in the U.S. However, many teens have turned to electronic cigarettes as a wholesome solution to enjoy their daily dose of nicotine. So as to reduce the selling point of the puff bar to teens, manufacturers will need to include more health-related language on their marketing materials.